Skip to Content

Student Handbook: Course Delivery

 

You may download the entire handbook as a PDF below

In the foreseeable future, the University plans to operate only a single Ed.D. cohort that begins each fall. This means that particular classes will be offered only once a year. The clear implication for students is that it is imperative that they keep up with the requirements for each class if they wish to graduate in three years. If, for example, a first-year student decided to drop a particular class, he or she would not be able to take it again until the following year, at which time it would likely conflict with a required second year class. The curriculum structure we have established allows students to obtain a doctorate in an accelerated fashion, but it also requires a high degree of discipline in keeping up with course requirements.

While the program is designed to permit completion within three years, students are normally permitted to take up to five years to meet the requirements for the Ed.D. Extension beyond five years requires approval of the Ed.D. core faculty. Such an extension will normally be provided to a student in good academic standing who is determined to be making satisfactory progress, for a period not to exceed an additional two years.

Courses are generally delivered in an intensive two day format whereby classes meet on a consecutive Friday and Saturday, with a couple weeks between sessions following the second class day. Variations in the regular schedule may occur to reflect holidays, days of religious significance, semester transitions, and other events. Classes are normally held on the main California State University, Sacramento campus.

The curriculum is carefully designed to provide a wide range of important skills, ideas, tools, and knowledge on educational policy content that we believe necessary for the success of educational leaders. The entire curriculum reflects the previously mentioned collaboration across departments and institutions, including a variety of stakeholders.

Learning Objectives

The core faculty have developed six general learning objectives listed in the first column of Table 4 for those who complete Sacramento State’s Doctoral Program in Education Policy and Leadership. The specific objectives that make up each of the six general objectives are listed in the second column of this table. These general and specific learning objectives guide curriculum and pedagogical choices made throughout the program. Students should familiarize themselves with these objectives. In a separate forthcoming document we will document how these objectives specifically match with the material taught in each Ed.D. core course.

Table 4: General and Specific Learning Objectives for Sacramento State's Ed.D. Program
General Specific

1. Critical Analysis

  • Problem definiation

  • Delineation of options

  • Research design

  • Causal and correlation analysis

2. Integrative Thinking
(interdisciplinary skill sets brought to bear on K-14 policy and administrative analysis)

  • Economic concepts and analysis

  • Socio-political environment and analysis

  • Budgeting concepts and budget analysis

  • Organizational analysis/change/development

  • Cultural context and analysis

  • legal context and analysis

3. Understanding Professional Role

  • Federal/California policy context

  • Role of public/private/non-profit sectors in education

  • Education workplace and role ethics

  • Parent/community engagement

  • Accountabilityto all stakeholders

4. Practical Applications

  • Data collection: how and where to get data

  • Analysis of qualitative and quantitative data

  • Implementation of data-based decisions

  • Supervision, evaluation, and professional development

  • Collective bargaining, appriasal, and compensation

5. Leadership

  • Development/oversight of organization's mission

  • Strategic planning

  • Management, problem solving, and conflict resolution

  • Collaboration and team building

  • Characteristics of effective leaders (courage, committment)

6. Equity

  • Promote access, retention, and equity

  • Undoing instituational barriers of racism, sexism, and classism

  • Setting high expectations for all students

  • Culturally responsive instructional leadership

  • Intersection of language and educational processes/structures